The Proof of Evolution blog is a Christian blog carrying each new page for the Proof of Evolution web site.
I believe the most powerful testimony to Christ is in the life of Christians. We don't need scientific evidence for God, as the tremendous power of Christians united in service to God overthrows every argument against him.
As a result, we Christians should be able to be honest with science. At some point, we are going to have to face the overwhelming evidence for evolution, knowing that Jesus Christ is the Truth. He is not afraid of the truth; he is the Truth.
This blog both covers current news relating to evolution and displays each new page uploaded on the Proof of Evolution web site.
I'm just passing on a link to a report with some clues to why all organic amino acids might be left-handed while all organic sugars are right-handed.
Scientists Discover New Clue to Chemical Origins of Life
Could you please then explain the evidence that seems to refute, or at least take into question, evolution? I am not saying it proves creation, I mearly
Permalink -- click for full blog post "A couple questions. "
God made Adam and Eve 15-40 years old, we think. God may have made an old earth. If the earth were stamped with a six thousand year old copyright date
Permalink -- click for full blog post "New old earth"
Specified complexity is the argument that evolution cannot explain how complex, successful organisms arose.
Permalink -- click for full blog post "Specified Complexity"
1.Something can't come from nothing 2. The fossil record is evidence of stasis-not evolutionary change 3. The few instances of changes /variation comes
Permalink -- click for full blog post "Life Doesn't Happen by Chance"
Is the Kachina Bridge Dinosaur Petroglyph proof that humans and dinosaurs co-existed? Did the Hopi Indians actually see a sauropod?
The Ica stones, were they not obviously forgeries, would provide astonishing evidence that dinosaurs, specifically triceratops, and man coexisted.
Permalink -- click for full blog post "Ica Stones"
This is a repost from my other blog.
I do have to grant one argument to the anti-evolutionists. Sometimes science oversteps its bounds.
This Discover article could have been requested by Answers in Genesis so that they would have an article to abuse.
Holy Nebraska Man, Batman! Discover actually led the article with a picture of one molar with which they are claiming to overturn early European human history!
Given, we can analyze internal and external structures better than we ever could. Determining that a tooth aligns better with archaic Homo sapien fossils than with Neandertal fossils is more possible than ever. Nonetheless, this finding is overriding determinations previously made, probably in similar confidence. Couldn't we at least issue the report a bit more humbly? "It appears ... " or "It may be ... " would be excellent expressions to find in this article.
What are the odds that other leading anthropologists are going to dispute the conclusions of this team? I'd say it's extremely likely. All sorts of confident statements were issued about Australopithecus sediba, but it was mere days before Donald Johanson, famous for discovering "Lucy," was disputing the conclusions of the discoverers.
I don't even want to run into an anti-evolutionist and hear them bring up the last falsely identified tooth one more time. Their argument may be pointless and irrelevant, but it's annoying. Why throw fodder to them when science is supposed to be known for its tentative conclusions.
This is my best argument for evolution as a Christian, godly, and reasonable position to take on creation and the progress of life.
Permalink -- click for full blog post "My Best Argument for Evolution, Directed at Christians"
I put up a blog called Bad Creationist Arguments: "There's Such a Thing As ... " at my other blog.
HXXBJUBE7XZD
Search
Proof-of-Evolution.com
Great home school video with reenactments of the Dover trial on Intelligent Design.